Following the Crotch Bomber attack on Flight 253 (Amsterdam/Detroit), Obama made no comment for several days. He finally showed up, without a necktie, and downplayed the al Qaeda operative as an “isolated extremist.”
Isolated extremist? Even though the man was trained by al Qaeda in Yemen and supplied with 80g of PETN which was sewn into his underpants. And even though he nearly killed 300 people in mid-flight.
Americans were outraged to see Obama covering up for yet another of his Moslem comrades. Especially since he was still blocking Congress from investigating Army Major Nidal Hasan, who served on Obama’s 2008 Presidential Transition Team before murdering 13 people at Fort Hood.
Hasan was an Army MAJOR — a very high position for a Moslem to hold. Especially a Moslem who openly advocated Jihad against Americans and whose business cards displayed the title “SoA” (Soldier of Allah). Years of outrageous and treasonous statements by Hasan were ignored by the Army as Jihad festered within the scheming Moslem.
And what happened when the CIA began intercepting Hasan’s email discussions with the 9-11 Imam in Yemen? Nothing. This Army Major was allowed to correspond at his leisure with an al Qaeda terrorist mentor. Because nobody wanted to state the obvious: Moslems in our government, in our military, are a cancer.
Does that sound harsh, the word “cancer?” It is actually too kind. For cancer doesn’t plot, organize, recruit, and execute attacks to murder 300 people at once, or 3,000 at the World Trade Center, or millions in a nuclear attack. No, cancer is a naturally occuring malady that kills without premeditation. It does not hate, it just exists.
This week, as Obama committed treason by covering up for yet ANOTHER moslem terrorist, one man finally said what many were thinking….
VP DICK CHENEY:
“As I’ve watched the events of the last few days it is clear once again that President Obama is trying to pretend we are not at war. He seems to think if he has a low-key response to an attempt to blow up an airliner and kill hundreds of people, we won’t be at war.
“He seems to think if he gives terrorists the rights of Americans, lets them lawyer up and reads them their Miranda rights, we won’t be at war. He seems to think if we bring the mastermind of Sept. 11 to New York, give him a lawyer and trial in civilian court, we won’t be at war.
“He seems to think if he closes Guantanamo and releases the hard-core Al Qaeda-trained terrorists still there, we won’t be at war. He seems to think if he gets rid of the words, ‘war on terror,’ we won’t be at war.
“But we are at war and when President Obama pretends we aren’t, it makes us less safe. Why doesn’t he want to admit we’re at war? [Because] it doesn’t fit with the view of the world he brought with him to the Oval Office. It doesn’t fit with what seems to be the goal of his presidency — social transformation — the restructuring of American society.
“President Obama’s first object and his highest responsibility must be to defend us against an enemy that knows we are at war.”
–Dick Cheney, 12/29/2009
The Communist Party is so concerned about you, they drink to calm themselves. Here’s Senator Max Baucus (D, Montana) drunk on the Senate floor, pushing DeathCare:
Let’s hand 1/6 of our economy to this man, who gets sloshed before speaking on national TV from the Senate floor. I trust this wino with my life. How about you?
UPDATE: Senator Pat Leahy (D) is DRUNK too!
The National Socialists (Nazis) thought they could do whatever they wanted. They were right. And now the USA Communist Party (Democrats) behave the same way.
They think you can’t stop them. And if you don’t spread the word and throw these Commies out, they’ll be correct.
Tell a friend about Brave New Commie. Share us on Twitter/Facebook using these buttons:
“Global Warming” got busted this week. It’s a HOAX.
The Hoax was designed to make you spend trillions on “Climate Taxes.”
But a hacker (or whistleblower) penetrated the UN’s favorite climate research lab, and downloaded thousands of e-mails between the “scientists.” How inconvenient…..
Welcome To ClimateGate
The UN has been lying about “global warming” for years. Why? To collect trillions in “climate taxes” and get rich running a “carbon trading market” with Goldman Sachs. They also want to establish “global governance,” according to Al Gore.
Leaked ClimateGate emails prove:
- Fake climate data created
- Suppressing/Deleting contrary data
- Doctoring the graphs
- Squashing contrary “peer reviews”
- “Peer reviewing” each other’s fake data
- Excluding/Threatening skeptics
- COVERING UP by deleting incriminating emails
- COVERING UP by destroying raw temp data
- Lying to the public
Socialists figure “Green is the new Red.” In other words, if they can’t sell you Communism, they’ll gain control via Environmentalism. So government tells us cars/people are making the planet hotter – and demands trillions in new taxes to “fix” this problem:
The Dog Ate Their Homework?
As ClimateGate erupted, CRU scientists were asked, again, to release their raw temperature data so the scientific community could verify their “global warming” conclusions.
The CRU response? They announced that ALL their raw temperature data was “lost” when they switched offices. So the dog ate their homework!
That excuse doesn’t work for schoolkids, and it shouldn’t work for “scientists” cooking a scam to steal trillions of dollars from people worldwide.
But at Copenhagen, what happens when a journalist asks a senior member of the UN IPCC about ClimateGate (during a press conference)? They summon armed UN guards to seize his camera:
Then, the same journalist tries asking Al Gore a question, but UN security rips his microphone apart:
Maybe Al Gore fears getting caught in another lie (like this):
Unfortunately for NASA and other “climate labs,” the dog-eating-homework excuse gets more ridiculous as more groups use it.
The first dog/homework excuse-maker was CRU. They “lost” all data for the past 150 years.
But which lab will be next? Who will next claim “You can’t have our raw data because OUR dog ate ours TOO?” At what point do folks say, “Hmm. That’s lots of dogs, in 50 countries, eating all that homework at 200 different universities, government agencies, and UN labs.”
Are you listening, NASA? Get my gist, EPA? What’s your excuse when real scientists ask to verify your data and conclusions? How about family emergency? Food poisoning? Better try bronchitis.
But wait, don’t those hacked emails say “If FOIA forces us to release our data, I’ll just destroy it instead?” Yes, that’s exactly what the leaked emails say. CRU cannot release their data, because it’s fraudulent and cooked. So they “lost” it.
Corky Boyd writes…
Update: The Times of London is now reporting all the underlying raw data to determine the actual measured temperatures for the past 150 years was destroyed in the 1980s. All that’s left are the “adjusted” figures.
Something smells fishy. Just what figures was Phil Jones et al working with for the past quarter of a century? Was he simply working from vapor? It is more likely the raw data was destroyed more recently to hide fraud.
Share these ClimateGate clips – tell a friend. They’re FUN for the whole family:
The Jon Stewart clip was scrubbed/deleted from YouTube, so start around the 2:20 mark at this other source.
Ken Lay (ENRON) Invented “Carbon Credits”
Al Gore made $100 million from this hoax – Bernie Madoff would be impressed. But who invented “carbon credit trading” anyway? Ken Lay, back at ENRON.
Here, Congress slams Al Gore, who lies about his profiteering from the “global warming” scam and his meetings with ENRON chief Ken Lay:
The biggest fraud ever perpetrated on mankind? It just got busted.
Since the MSM (Mainstream Media) refuses to cover ClimateGate, send everybody you know the direct link to this article (or Facebook/Twitter it using buttons at bottom): https://bravenewcommie.wordpress.com/2009/11/24/busted-the-global-warming-hoax/
Is this UN hoax CRIMINAL?
As J.R. Dunn points out….
Well, first, let’s cover what you don’t do.
* You don’t manipulate data. (As CRU chief scientist Phil Jones stated he was doing in the now-famous “Mike’s trick” e-mail, not to mention throughout the now-famous source code.)
* You don’t fabricate data. (As one CRU scientist did while compiling weather-station data. Running into problems, he states, “I can make it up. So I did.” He adds an evil smiley face. This e-mail has gone under radar up until now. It can be found in the comments on James Delingpole’s blog.
* You don’t deny data to other investigators. (As Hansen, Jones, and, it appears, everybody else in the warming community has done at one time or another.)
* You don’t destroy evidence. (As the members of the CRU did following a Freedom of Information request.)
* You don’t bury contradictory data. (As Jones and several colleagues did in an attempt to undercut the impact of the Medieval Warming Period.)
* You don’t secretly manipulate the argument from behind the scenes. (As the CRU staff did with the website Realclimate.org., screening comments to allow only those that supported the warming thesis.)
* You don’t secretly undercut your critics. (As Mann advised the CRU to do concerning the scientific journal, Climate Researh: “I think we have to stop considering ‘Climate Research’ as a legitimate peer-reviewed journal. Perhaps we should encourage our colleagues in the climate research community to no longer submit to, or cite papers in, this journal.”)
* You don’t try to get a journal editor critical of your case fired. (As the CRU staff evidently succeeded in doing with an editor for Geophysical Research Letters.)
From which point we are forced to conclude that AGW is not science, and that any “consensus” that can drawn from it is a consensus of fraud.
(The late-breaking revelations of temperature manipulations at New Zealand’s NiWA institute — another one of Mike’s tricks? — merely underlines the lesson of CRU. Now that the dam has busted, we’ll be hearing dozens of stories like this over the weeks and months to come.)
Humans exhale CO2 – it isn’t poison. Plants consume CO2 to grow – it’s their food. The human body is 18% carbon.
Yet Al Gore and the EPA tell you CO2 is a “pollutant.” This is ridiculous. But naive people are easily misled by profiteers (Gore & Goldman Sachs) looking to sell you “carbon credits” and make you pay “carbon taxes.”
And polar bears? In 1950, there were only about 5,000. Today, there’s around 25,000 polar bears. And they swim – they’re not stranded on ice blocks.
Click below for larger image. Notice we’re on a downslope (cooling). Also notice BOTH trendlines since 1700 BC are cooling (not warming). Solar activity is the main factor driving temperatures – NOT how much methane cows fart, or how much “carbon tax” you pay.
Media Blackout of History’s Biggest Scam
With the exception of FoxNews, the MSM (Mainstream Media) have largely ignored this story – the biggest hoax in history. Do they think ignoring it will make it go away? Stop “Cap + Tax” by signing the Monckton Petition.
Lord Monckton quizzes a Greenpeace member about “global warming”….
Robert Tracinski observes….
This scandal goes beyond scientific journals and into other media used to promote the global warming dogma. For example, RealClimate.org has been billed as an objective website at which global warming activists and skeptics can engage in an impartial debate.
But in the CRU e-mails, the global warming establishment boasts that RealClimate is in their pocket:
“I wanted you guys to know that you’re free to use RC in any way you think would be helpful. Gavin and I are going to be careful about what comments we screen through…. We can hold comments up in the queue and contact you about whether or not you think they should be screened through or not, and if so, any comments you’d like us to include. [T]hink of RC as a resource that is at your disposal…. We’ll use our best discretion to make sure the skeptics don’t get to use the RC comments as a megaphone.”
And anyone doubting that the mainstream media is in on it, too, should check out New York Times reporter Andrew Revkin’s toadying apologia for the CRU e-mails, masquerading as a news report.
The picture that emerges is simple. In any discussion of global warming, either in the scientific literature or in the mainstream media, the outcome is always predetermined.
For more than a decade, we’ve been told that there is a scientific “consensus” that humans are causing global warming, that “the debate is over” and all “legitimate” scientists acknowledge the truth of global warming. Now we know what this “consensus” really means. What it means is: the fix is in.
This is an enormous case of organized scientific fraud, but it is not just scientific fraud. It is also a criminal act. Suborned by billions of taxpayer dollars devoted to climate research, dozens of prominent scientists have established a criminal racket in which they seek government money — Phil Jones has raked in a total of £13.7 million in grants from the British government — which they then use to falsify data and defraud the taxpayers.
It’s the most insidious kind of fraud: a fraud in which the culprits are lauded as public heroes.
How bad is the coverup? Wikipedia fired its climate editor after he rewrote/removed 5,428 articles to promote “global warming.” Were his first 4,000 attempts at rewriting history acceptable? Only when you hit 5,000 does Wikipedia take notice.
Here’s one article their “climate editor” couldn’t change: 100 Reasons Global Warming is Bogus.
The Mainstream Media is suppressing ClimateGate, so get the word out! Send everybody the direct link to this article (or Facebook/Twitter it using buttons at bottom): https://bravenewcommie.wordpress.com/2009/11/24/busted-the-global-warming-hoax/
More detail on this chart can be found here.
Take Action – CONTACT YOUR POLITICIAN
Use the ClimateGate petition to notify your Senator, or use the following links (from Joanne Nova) to share your opinion….
AUSTRALIA : A list of Australian Members and Senators is here. (Thanks Allen)
HUNGARY: Parlament List (Thanks Attila).
NETHERLANDS: parliament list. (Thanks Arnold).
NZ: Here is the PDF list for New Zealand. (Thanks Rereke.)
SWEDEN: Parliamentary emails. (Thanks Ahrvid).
UK: MPs and Lords. (Thanks Phillip)
Unfortunately they all require contact through their web sites. Both Senate and Congress have a way to look up the name of the Representative by zip code or Senators by state and then get to the individual web site. They no longer permit direct email. Their web sites also give a phone number.
Every country that stays out of the deal is a win for us. This deal needs to be global. They know it.
And the Communists are taking a major hit from ClimateGate. At Copenhagen, Lord Monckton caught the UN hiding their “World Governance” draft:
For breaking ClimateGate news, check back soon. More at Climate Depot.
And finally, here’s some “deniers” who questioned the “settled science” of The Church of Global Warming:
Is it wrong to compare Hitler to Obama?
My comparison of Hilter and Obama was nearly complete when my assistant burst into the room in a panic. Sobbing, she revealed that Hitler drank Earl Grey, while Obama prefers camomile.
Dejected, I shredded my comparison, then burned it.
Many observers feel that Obama cannot be compared with Hitler until Obama becomes German, sleeps with his niece, grows a moustache, and trims it just so. Any comparison of political tactics, between the National Socialist (Hitler) and the Socialist (Obama), are off-limits due to umpteen traits that “just don’t match.”
One such objection? “Hitler stuffed Jews into ovens! Obama hasn’t done, and won’t do, anything nearly as evil!”
I couldn’t agree more. Obama can’t get away with that, and probably wouldn’t want to. But I have two questions:
Question #1: The week before Hitler murdered his first Jew, were Hitler’s actions until that point acceptable? Liberals, please answer “yes” or “no.”
Question #2: Did Hitler’s act of murdering his first Jew erase his prior actions, so that we cannot compare them to the actions of other dictators?
Hitler did many things before the first Jew was placed in an oven. Hitler did many of those things as leader of the National Socialist (Nazi) Party. What if today’s politician only does half the things Hitler did, but doesn’t murder anyone? Must I deem his actions “not similar” because the climax is missing?
Imagine a bunch of liberals watching Star Wars. After the movie ends, we break into the projection booth, and chop off Act 3 (we delete the final act). We then play the shortened version to the same liberal audience. Then, we ask their impressions. They seem confused….
“Who’s this grandpa character in the bathrobe? The shiny metal guy, is that a robot? And who’s the jerk in the black mask with asthma? This movie makes no sense!”
So we remind the liberals that moments ago, they watched the same exact movie. Suddenly angry, they snap at us….
“This movie bears no similarity to Star Wars, and we can’t BELIEVE you’re comparing it to Star Wars! The two movies have NOTHING in common! After all, in the shorter movie, THE DEATH STAR DOESN’T EXPLODE! So how can you compare this to Star Wars?? You’re crazy!”
Liberals will accept no comparison until we travel via time machine 10 years into the future, and prove to them that Obama is stuffing people in ovens. There are two problems with that. First, my time machine is broken. Second, I don’t believe Obama will ever stuff anyone into an oven.
Yet here we are, in Act 1 of the same Socialist/Fascist movie we’ve seen in Germany, the USSR, Venezuela, Cuba and China.
In the USA, I don’t care if Act 2 turns out to be different. I don’t care if Act 3 never happens. (Our version of the movie, the American version, might be a two-act play). But the absence of a matching Act 3 doesn’t make Obama’s Act 1 “not comparable” to Act 1 of Hitler/Castro/Chavez/Mussolini/Stalin/Mao.
For skeptical liberals, let us name a few parallels between the actions of Hitler and Obama. Just a smattering. No, their brands of cologne still don’t match. Yet despite that logical flaw, let us focus on our topic – their actions.
The Nazis are recognized as the all-time masters of propaganda. Hitler appointed Goebbels head of propaganda to create films, art and magnificent speeches promoting National Socialism (Nazism).
On August 10, 2009, Obama directed Yosi Sargent of the taxpayer-funded National Endowment for the Arts (NEA) to organize a conference call with 21 different NEA-friendly artistic organizations. The artist groups had been active in the Obama campaign, and most had recently received financial “support” from the taxpayer-funded NEA. During the conference call, these artist groups were urged “to push the President and push his administration.” That is a clear violation of law. They were also urged to create art designed to push Obama’s “health care” and his other issues.
Within 48 hours after this conference call, all 21 artist organizations had issued statements supporting Obama’s health care position. Their taxpayer-funded “Obama Art” would take longer than 48 hours to create. The entire scheme broke American laws designed to limit the power of the Executive Branch (White House). The art they created is propaganda.
Conclusion? Both Hitler and Obama funded propaganda to push their political party and positions. The goal is to persuade men, women and children toward specific political conclusions using art, music and film. Obama’s propaganda is subsidized by the NEA using taxpayer money, in violation of American law. When confronted about the NEA conference call, the White House lied, issuing various denials before finally reassigning Sargent after the audiotape was played repeatedly on TV.
Intimidation and Seizure of Private Property
Hitler intimidated the Jews and seized their gold, art and real estate. Obama intimidates business executives, and seizes their companies (AIG / Chrysler / GM) and their salaries.
The excuse to socialize banks is “The bank accepted a bailout, so the White House can retroactively set whatever terms it wishes.” Yet many banks were forced to accept bailout funds, and when several banks attempted to repay those funds, the White House turned them away. But wait, wasn’t the purpose of bailouts to get banks back on their feet? That’s how the bailouts were advertised.
But the true purpose of the bailouts, under Obama, is to control the banks. The White House wants their strings to stay attached so they can rule banks by fiat. And now, Obama uses the same approach to seize non-banks such as automobile companies.
Hitler sent the SS and Gestapo to intimidate Jews (Kristallnacht) and round them up for abuse. Obama sends busloads of SEIU and ACORN foot soldiers to the homes of business executives, where they march, yell and intimidate. This “Ostapo” is also sent to shake down banks and insurance companies. A payment in the right amount, to ACORN or the correct union, ends the protest.
For years, ACORN shook down banks, threatening to file grievances unless the banks issued mortgages to first-time home buyers with little or no credit. Who advised ACORN on such techniques? A young lawyer named Barack Obama. After 20 years of this, poor people “owned” trillions worth of real estate via bad mortgages. When enough of these subprime (bad credit risk) borrowers couldn’t pay their mortgages, the subprime mortgage crisis sank the world economy. Who did liberals blame? AIG, the insurance company hired to hedge against these same reckless gambles forced by the government.
Conclusion? Both Hitler and Obama intimidated private citizens at their homes/offices, using groups of thugs, to (i) seize private property, or (ii) cause the forfeiture of private property. The media is used in both cases to demonize the target and garner public support for the illegal seizures. Typically, the media joins the White House in demonizing the target, rather than siding with property law.
Instead of blaming bad government policy, the White House blames “greed” and punishes the banks with more bad policy. Just as Hitler blamed the “greedy Jews” and punished them with draconian laws.
Obama’s latest stunt is the single-handed appointment of a “Pay Czar” to tell banks how much their employees can be paid, thereby abrogating compensation contracts and violating the rights of citizens to enter into agreements free of duress. That sounds like a certain German dictator, but I cannot recall his name.
Rushing New Laws
Hitler passed whatever laws he pleased to enforce his personal wishes. Obama pushes, then signs, trillion-dollar bills overnight – without reading them, and without allowing citizens to read them let alone debate them.
Conclusion? Just like Nazi Germany, the people get whatever laws Obama feels like rushing into effect. If citizens object, they are demonized by the White House as “Teabaggers” and “Extremists.” Unfortunately, Obama’s pet legislation involves trillions of dollars (so-called Stimulus bill) and the annexation of one-sixth of the economy (so-called Healthcare bill).
Suppression of Dissent
One of Hitler’s first actions was to shut down all Jewish newspapers. These included 3 with national circulation, 4 cultural newspapers, a handful of sports papers, and dozens of community newsletters (one in Berlin had 40,000 subscribers). Did Hitler do this because he disliked getting newsprint on his hands? Or did he close the papers to sever the ties between Jews and their communities and make it more difficult for Jews to safely emigrate from an increasingly dangerous Germany? It would be difficult for Jews to publicly protest Nazi abuses after their newspapers were shut down.
Similarly, Obama has identified 3 media targets to suppress:
Obama Target #1 – TV Networks That Don’t Kowtow
Obama’s primary target is FoxNews. By and large, the other networks parrot Obama’s talking points. For example, Chris Matthews effused on MSNBC that when he hears Obama speak, he feels “a tingle up his leg.”
Obama attempted to involve four TV networks in his FoxNews boycott by excluding Fox from the White House pool interview of his “pay czar,” Kenneth Feinberg. Unfortunately for Obama, the four networks sensed that they might be the next targets of suppression, so they refused to participate. Obama relented, without murdering the TV executives and burning their stations to the ground, as Hitler might have done to stubborn Jews. In the USA, with a largely free press, such revenge would be reported to the public.
Obama Target #2 – Talk Radio
Obama has targeted conservative radio hosts by name – notably Rush Limbaugh and Sean Hannity. He has directed the American people to “Stop listening to Rush Limbaugh.” In the months following Obama’s denouncement of Limbaugh, the radio host’s audience nearly doubled.
Thus, Obama’s new attack on talk radio involves breaking up the national reach of conservative radio shows, forcing each “local community” to develop and approve its own radio content. This “localism” would cripple and dilute the audiences of national radio stars opposed to Obama, such as Limbaugh, Hannity and Mark Levin.
Obama Target #3 – The Internet
Obama’s latest attack on free speech involves the internet. Obama is pushing so-called “net neutrality” laws to control how the internet distributes information to the public.
But Obama realizes that if he crushes talk radio, TV and internet will fill the free-speech void. He cannot control the flow of public information without controlling ALL widely used media. Thus, he is attacking all formats. The only format he’s not attacking is newspapers, as they are mostly liberal, sympathetic to Socialist power grabs, critical of his opponents, and are close to extinction anyway due to dwindling readership. Hitler would have found America’s collapsing newspaper industry very convenient – no need to shut them down since they’re dying on their own.
Conclusion? Both Hitler and Obama attempt to suppress dissent wherever it may arise. Hitler’s job was fairly simple – shut the newspapers. Obama faces a bigger challenge – if he controls TV, the internet will still inform the public. Obama must systematically subjugate all media outlets before he can crush dissent. He seeks to force the same fawning adoration displayed by MSNBC upon all media via a catalog of new “fairness” laws.
Hitler and his National Socialist (Nazi) party favored euthanizing retarded people, the handicapped, and gays. This began well before the Nazis started systematically murdering Jews, who were also deemed undesirable.
Similarly, Obama favors “letting the elderly die,” as Robert Reich announced in taped statements to an appreciative Socialist audience.
The “Obamacare” plan of socialized medicine will ration care to the elderly. This is already standard in the UK and Canada. Patients wait months, sometimes years, for routine operations. During this wait, some suffer in pain, some suffer deteriorating health, while others simply die.
Mark Levin exposes the evils of Obamacare in this brilliant audio at the 20:00 mark.
Conclusion? Obama feels that elderly people have outlived their usefulness, and thus can be denied medical care. Thus, his Socialist healthcare proposals use the QALY (Quality-Adjusted Life-Years) system. Under this system, doctors consult a government chart of ages and maladies. If the patient only has 3 years of expected life remaining, but the hip replacement is only approved for those expected to live another 4 years, then the patient is denied the operation and must suffer for the rest of his life.
“Don’t worry,” we’re told, “this saves money.” Well, it would save even more money to just deny care to everyone. If saving money is the primary goal, why are we spending billions on medical care to begin with? Perhaps we should let everyone, even young people, die of ailments.
Hitler felt that retarded or handicapped people were undesirable, and cost the state too much to be kept alive. Obama feels the same way about elderly people – he just can’t say it openly, so he says it through policy.
Unions / Automobile Companies
This comparison is stunning. In the 1930’s, Hitler outlawed previous unions, then forced all Germans to join and pay dues to a new union, the German Labor Front. 10% of the dues were allocated to a program called “Strength Through Joy” (Kraft Dutch Freude), which oversaw recreation and sports. Part of those funds were directed to build an automobile factory, since Hitler considered cars related to sport. Thus, Hitler forced participation in a union – to create an automobile plant, which he controlled.
In 2009, Obama didn’t need to build an automobile plant – one already existed. He just didn’t control it. So Obama forced Chrysler bondholders into a “bankruptcy” that didn’t follow the laws of bankruptcy. Instead of getting their due, senior creditors (Yale University’s endowment, pension funds, and other institutions) were forced into a secondary position by Obama. This was contrary to law and against the terms of their bond holdings. Obama handed 55% ownership in Chrysler to UAW (a union and junior creditor) while allowing senior creditors (bondholders) to keep only 30 cents on the dollar.
The end result? Hitler had his union-owned car factory, and Obama had his union-owned car factory. Each man controlled his factory via intermediaries, who were paid off by union benefits. Coercion was used in both cases to acquire each factory.
Dear Liberals, do the parallels still escape you?
If you still don’t see any similarities between Act 1 (Hitler) and Act 1 (Obama), please re-read this column until you do.
After that, if you still don’t see the comparison, I need your participation in a windmill project which only costs you $40,000 and promises enormous returns within the first month. It’s located in Nigeria. Al Gore says it’s the best weather machine on the market.
Obama names FoxNews “Jew of The Week”
Hitler asked himself a question: How to gain power? His solution was elegant for himself and his National Socialist party. Simply choose a scapegoat, demonize that scapegoat as a greedy threat to the country, then lead a frightened population in destroying that scapegoat and taking whatever you want.
For the common good, of course.
Hitler chose “the Jews” as the most practical target for two reasons. First, they were a different religion – most Germans weren’t Jewish. Also, Jews seemed fairly wealthy, at a time when most Germans were poor. Thus, Hitler had “strange religion” and “class envy” working in his favor.
Add rallies demonizing Jews as greedy and evil, and many desperate people were willing to accept the premise that ridding Germany of Jews would help the country recover from economic disaster.
But today, Obama cannot run the same plot. He cannot demonize Jews. That’s not practical since (i) it’s been done, so everyone recognizes the strategy, and (ii) liberals claim to hold all religions in equal regard, so demonizing a specific religion is considered gauche.
Yet Obama has perfected Hilter’s technique. Since he cannot single out the Jews, he’s found someone better than the Jews: Whatever group he points at.
Yes, the new Socialist strategy is superior to Hitler’s because it can demonize any group in a matter of hours. I am naming this Obama/Hitler strategy here.
It’s called Jew of The Week.
Jew of The Week is better than “the Jews,” since it can be virtually any group, within certain limitations. It cannot be a religion. It cannot be a sexual orientation. It cannot be a race. Such categories are impolite. No, the Jew of The Week is just “greedy” and “evil” and must be stopped for the common good. Typically, the Weekly Jew is whatever group Obama thinks will enable the biggest power grab. How does it work?
Step 1 – Obama chooses the Jew of The Week (works it into a speech).
Step 2 – State run media demonizes the Weekly Jew on TV. Meanwhile, since Obama hasn’t yet established an official SS and Gestapo, he summons the “Ostapo.” He buses SEIU and ACORN to conduct their “pogrom-lite” at the Weekly Jew’s workplace and home.
Step 3 – White House conducts polls to determine when the Weekly Jew has been sufficiently demonized in the public mind.
Step 4 – White House announces possible “solutions” to the Weekly Jew, for the common good. They’re tracked via polling so the White House can determine how radical it can be in solving the Jew-tastrophe.
Step 5 – The chosen Solution is executed by the White House. Solutions include “We’ll regulate the greedy Jew” with new laws restricting his freedom, and “We’ll take stuff away from the Jew and give it to you” via welfare, new programs, free money, no-doc houses, cars, tax breaks, or blatant payoffs to Obama crony groups (unions, ACORN).
The subtext of this stunt is always the same – Jews are greedy, but you’re not, so you deserve what they have. And remember, Socialist politicians aren’t greedy or seeking power – they wandered into politics after missionary work in Sudan dried up.
Recent Jews of the Week
- Automotive Companies
- Chrysler Shareholders / Bondholders
- AIG Executives
- The Rich
- Insurance Companies
- Doctors – Americans didn’t enjoy this Weekly Jew because they like doctors. Obama almost ruined his game by wildly claiming doctors were butchering people, amputating healthy limbs for “thirty, forty, fifty thousand dollars” apiece.
This week’s Jew? FoxNews, of course. The media slamfest, led by Axelrod and the Ballerina (Rahm Emanuel), was only blunted when other networks, fearing they’d be next, refused to join the White House boycott of FoxNews. Thus, the “Weekly Kristallnacht” was tossed back in Obama’s face.
What was the goal? With each Weekly Jew comes Obama’s solution – take away their companies, or run them out of business. Control of any company the Weekly Jew is allowed to keep? Obama installs his deputies for that. And what of the Weekly Jew’s reputation? That was the first thing the President had to destroy. So sorry.
I name this week’s Jew for reference, nothing more. Because the moment I publish this article, Obama and his National Socialists will already be on the next Jew. By the time you read this, FoxNews will be replaced by whatever Jew is behind Curtain Number 12.
Stay Tuned for These Jews
- Venture Capitalists
- Other TV Networks that disobey Obama
- Talk Radio
- Internet Companies
Here in Hymietown (aka Manhattan), Jews are realizing that 78% of their creed voted for Obama, and unwittingly for policies that mirror the National Socialist tactics of Nazi Germany. Over time, real Jews learn to be wary of Fascism. But by the time each Weekly Jew learns to protect itself, it’s already next week – Obama has already stripped away their private property, distributing it to his cronies and special interests. It’s too late.
The silver lining of this column? By revealing how the White House has refined Hitler’s tactic, perhaps I will prompt President Obama to name me Jew of the Week. He could then demonize me as irresponsible, declare my computer poorly maintained, and give it to someone more trustworthy. And I could take a vacation.